Electronic Medical Records: Client/Server or ASP

ArticleSoft.com » Technology » Electronic Medical Records: Client/Server or ASP

Electronic Medical Records: Client/Server or ASP

Author: Robert Bell | Total views: 57 | Word Count: 646 | Category: Technology | Date: Mar 5th 2007

When buying Electronic Medical Record (EMR) Software which is better ASP or Client/Server Unfortuantely there is no right answer. Youll need to decide whats important to your practice and whats not. In this article well explore the advantages and disadvantages of each model so youll be able to make an educated decision when the time comes to purchase an EMR software solution.

ASP is a remotely hosted software system accessed via an internet web browser, similar to the model used in online banking. This remotely hosted system is accessed by paying a rental or service fee. The server is secure and HIPAA compliant and is not located in your office. All technical aspects of the server are managed by a professional IT company, and you pay a monthly access fee (or per occurrence fee) for the services of this IT company. The cost of an ASP-based system is relatively low in the beginning, however because the fees never stop the cost over the long term adds up and is usually ends up being more expensive than using a Client/Server-based system. One of the other benefits of the ASP based system is that almost all computing is done on the remote server, thereby reducing the minimum computer hardware requirements on the clients/workstations. ASP allows you to access all of your information at any time, from any place with internet access. Like all comparisons with advantages come disadvantages. Loss of customizability; the host server is being accessed by many different users. Although your data is secure, your individual customized needs are not met as readily as you may desire. One of the other disadvanteges is that an ASP system does not move as quickly as a Client/Server system. This is and important factor to consider with point n' click intensive Electronic Medical Record software as vital time may be lost by waiting for data to transfer over the internet; these seconds can quickly add up to minutes and hours of a couple weeks time. Accountability issues are a deep consideration to ASP. Company service degradation is felt more acutely and such things as vendor bankruptcy could have a more drastic impact on the practice as a whole. Periodically check the stability of the EMR software vendor, and ask for a backup copy of your data for your own records.

Client/Server models allow for quicker response times in the application as the data from the server to the client is transmitted much faster (usually 100 Mbits/second). The newer client/server products developed in Java and Microsoft .Net are capable of offering the best of both worlds as they have the speed of a local system plus the accessibility from a remote location. Where traditional client/server products required practices to use MS Terminal Services or Citrix technology to access their data from remote locations, these newer systems can be accessed from any internet browser. Client/Server also boasts the benefits of practice having the control over there data. However with this control comes responsibility; the responsibility of being responsible for your data as you are now open to the risk of theft, fire, hard-drive failure and data corruption.

Many IT futurists consider ASP based systems to be the future however many offices find they dont have the need for remote access and dont want to put their data in the hands of another company making client/server systems still a popular option. In most cases, if an office has multiple locations an ASP system should always be considered but if an office requires high-performance and doesnt have multiple locations the client/server system may be the better option. Speak with your IT consultant and the software vendor to get all the facts you need to make an educated decision.
This is an excerpt from the The Electronic Medical Record eBook by EMR Experts, Inc. (www.emrexperts.com)

Article Source: ArticleSoft.com

About the Author

John Deutsch is the Executive Vice President of Electronic Medical Record Software company. You can find more information by visiting Electronic Health Record experts. You can also contact EMR Software experts via above website.

Copy and Paste Article Code.

Remember: The article body, title, author bio and links may not be changed or removed. By publishing this article, you agree to all the terms in our Terms of Service.

When buying Electronic Medical Record (EMR) Software which is better ASP or Client/Server Unfortuantely there is no right answer. Youll need to decide whats important to your practice and whats not. In this article well explore the advantages and disadvantages of each model so youll be able to make an educated decision when the time comes to purchase an EMR software solution. 
 
ASP is a remotely hosted software system accessed via an internet web browser, similar to the model used in online banking. This remotely hosted system is accessed by paying a rental or service fee. The server is secure and HIPAA compliant and is not located in your office. All technical aspects of the server are managed by a professional IT company, and you pay a monthly access fee (or per occurrence fee) for the services of this IT company. The cost of an ASP-based system is relatively low in the beginning, however because the fees never stop the cost over the long term adds up and is usually ends up being more expensive than using a Client/Server-based system. One of the other benefits of the ASP based system is that almost all computing is done on the remote server, thereby reducing the minimum computer hardware requirements on the clients/workstations. ASP allows you to access all of your information at any time, from any place with internet access. Like all comparisons with advantages come disadvantages. Loss of customizability; the host server is being accessed by many different users. Although your data is secure, your individual customized needs are not met as readily as you may desire. One of the other disadvanteges is that an ASP system does not move as quickly as a Client/Server system. This is and important factor to consider with point n' click intensive Electronic Medical Record software as vital time may be lost by waiting for data to transfer over the internet; these seconds can quickly add up to minutes and hours of a couple weeks time. Accountability issues are a deep consideration to ASP. Company service degradation is felt more acutely and such things as vendor bankruptcy could have a more drastic impact on the practice as a whole. Periodically check the stability of the EMR software vendor, and ask for a backup copy of your data for your own records. 
 
Client/Server models allow for quicker response times in the application as the data from the server to the client is transmitted much faster (usually 100 Mbits/second). The newer client/server products developed in Java and Microsoft .Net are capable of offering the best of both worlds as they have the speed of a local system plus the accessibility from a remote location. Where traditional client/server products required practices to use MS Terminal Services or Citrix technology to access their data from remote locations, these newer systems can be accessed from any internet browser. Client/Server also boasts the benefits of practice having the control over there data. However with this control comes responsibility; the responsibility of being responsible for your data as you are now open to the risk of theft, fire, hard-drive failure and data corruption. 
 
Many IT futurists consider ASP based systems to be the future however many offices find they dont have the need for remote access and dont want to put their data in the hands of another company making client/server systems still a popular option. In most cases, if an office has multiple locations an ASP system should always be considered but if an office requires high-performance and doesnt have multiple locations the client/server system may be the better option. Speak with your IT consultant and the software vendor to get all the facts you need to make an educated decision. 
This is an excerpt from the The Electronic Medical Record eBook by EMR Experts, Inc. (www.emrexperts.com) Article Source: <a href="http://www.articlesoft.com" target="_blank">ArticleSoft.com</a> About the Author: John Deutsch is the Executive Vice President of <a href="http://www.emrexperts.com/electronic-medical-record-software/index.php
">Electronic Medical Record Software</a> company. You can find more information by visiting <a href="http://www.emrexperts.com">Electronic Health Record</a> experts. You can also contact <a href="http://www.emrexperts.com/emr-software/index.php">EMR Software</a> experts via above website.